Politics

UK unprepared for prolonged war with Russia, military experts warn

Navigation

Ask Onix

UK faces critical gaps in war readiness against Russia

As Russia's war in Ukraine nears its fourth year, British military leaders warn the UK lacks the reserves, ammunition, and infrastructure to sustain a prolonged conflict with Moscow, despite recent defense spending increases.

Hybrid warfare threats escalate across Europe

Russian President Vladimir Putin's December 2 remarks-accusing Europe of obstructing Ukraine peace efforts while boasting of readiness for war-have heightened concerns about Kremlin aggression beyond Ukraine. Analysts point to rising hybrid warfare tactics, including cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns, and sabotage of undersea cables and pipelines critical to the UK's tech-dependent economy.

The Royal Navy has responded by deploying underwater drones to monitor Russian spy vessels like the Yantar, suspected of mapping infrastructure for potential wartime sabotage. A conflict could disrupt financial transactions, energy supplies, and communications within days, crippling civilian life before conventional military engagements begin.

Military shortfalls exposed by Ukraine war lessons

At a London conference hosted by the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI), experts highlighted glaring deficiencies in the UK's ability to fight a protracted war. Hamish Mundell, a RUSI analyst, warned that Britain's military lacks the depth to absorb losses, citing slow reserve regeneration pipelines and limited medical capacity. "The plan for mass casualties appears to assume none will occur," he said.

"There are shortfalls in ammunition, artillery, vehicles, air defense, and personnel, with no ability to regenerate units or casualties."

Justin Crump, CEO of Sibylline intelligence firm

The Ukraine war has underscored two critical lessons: the dominance of drones in modern warfare and the necessity of "mass"-large-scale personnel and equipment reserves. Russia, despite suffering over 1.1 million casualties since 2022, has replaced losses by mobilizing its vast manpower pool and ramping up military production. Its factories now churn out 150 tanks, 550 infantry vehicles, and 50 artillery pieces monthly.

In contrast, Western Europe would need years to match Russia's output. Keir Giles of Chatham House emphasized, "Mass is vital for anyone facing Russia on land. Deep reserves are essential."

Calls for military service revival meet resistance

France and Germany have reintroduced voluntary military service for 18-year-olds, but the UK's cultural aversion to conscription has stalled similar proposals. Former Army Chief Gen. Sir Patrick Sanders' 2024 suggestion to train a "citizen army" was rejected by Downing Street. Ed Arnold of RUSI noted, "The UK lacks institutional memory of national service, which ended in the 1960s."

Current deployable British Army strength stands at 54,000-below Russia's average two-month casualty rate in Ukraine. Analysts warn the UK's land forces could be "degraded" within weeks in a direct conflict.

Defense spending lagging behind threats

While the Labour government has increased defense spending by £5 billion this year and signed 1,000 new contracts, critics argue funding remains inadequate. Former Defense Secretary Sir Ben Wallace called out "government spin" and "hollow rhetoric," contrasting the UK's 2.5% GDP defense target for 2027 with Russia's 7% spending.

A Ministry of Defence spokesperson countered, citing investments in laser weapons, a £9 billion housing upgrade for forces, and a new defense pact with Norway. However, delays in projects like the Ajax armored vehicle program underscore systemic inefficiencies.

NATO flashpoints and Russian aggression

Military planners identify several potential conflict zones if Putin expands aggression beyond Ukraine. The Suwalki Gap-a 60-mile corridor between Poland and Lithuania-could provide Russia a land bridge to its Baltic exclave of Kaliningrad. The Baltic states, former Soviet republics with Russian-speaking minorities, are also at risk. Estonia's Narva, a majority Russian-speaking town near the Russian border, hosts a 900-strong UK battle group that would be reinforced to brigade strength in wartime.

Other flashpoints include Norway's Svalbard archipelago, where Russia maintains a presence in the mining town of Barentsburg. The UK's staunch support for Ukraine has made it a prime target for Kremlin hostility, evidenced by the 2006 polonium poisoning of Alexander Litvinenko and the 2018 Novichok attack on Sergei Skripal, which killed civilian Dawn Sturgess.

Alliance reliance and uncertain US commitment

While a direct UK-Russia war is unlikely, experts warn of escalation if NATO's collective defense falters. The wildcard is US President Donald Trump, whose commitment to NATO has been questioned. Adm. Cavo Dragone, NATO's Military Committee chair, insisted Trump remains "absolutely committed," but analysts caution that Trump's unpredictability could embolden Putin.

Keir Giles of Chatham House urged the British public to recognize the stakes: "Freedom doesn't come for free. Lives will have to change."

Related posts

Report a Problem

Help us improve by reporting any issues with this response.

Problem Reported

Thank you for your feedback

Ed