Science

Kitchen sponges harbor billions of bacteria—are brushes a safer alternative?

Navigation

Ask Onix

Kitchen sponges: A microbial hotspot in your home

The humble kitchen sponge, used daily to scrub plates and glasses, doubles as an ideal breeding ground for bacteria. Warm, moist, and packed with food particles, it offers microbes a near-perfect habitat-so much so that researchers have found densities rivaling those in human stool samples.

Scientific findings on sponge bacteria

In 2017, microbiologist Markus Egert at Germany's Furtwangen University analyzed used kitchen sponges and identified 362 distinct bacterial species. In some areas, concentrations reached 54 billion bacteria per square centimeter. Egert compared the findings to fecal samples, underscoring the sheer scale of microbial life thriving in sponges.

A 2022 study by synthetic biologist Lingchong You at Duke University revealed why sponges are so hospitable. Using computer models and lab experiments with E. coli, his team discovered that the varied pore sizes in sponges create diverse microenvironments, accommodating both solitary and social bacteria. "The sponge's structure provides so many niches that every microbe finds its happy place," Egert noted.

Are sponge bacteria harmful?

While sponges teem with bacteria, most pose little risk to healthy individuals. Egert's 2017 study found that five of the ten most common species were related to bacteria that can infect immunocompromised people, though none were linked to severe foodborne illnesses. The pathogens responsible for 90% of food poisoning hospitalizations-E. coli, Salmonella, and Campylobacter-were rare in sponges.

Jennifer Quinlan, a food safety professor at Prairie View A&M University, tested 100 sponges from Philadelphia homes in 2017 and found only 1-2% contained bacteria tied to food poisoning, and in minimal quantities. "Most sponge bacteria just cause odors," she said. "But if you wipe raw meat juices, pathogens like Salmonella can take hold."

Brushes vs. sponges: Which is safer?

Solveig Langsrud of Norway's Nofima institute compared sponges and brushes in 2022. Both harbored similar harmless bacteria, but brushes had far fewer microbes overall. When researchers introduced Salmonella, it thrived in sponges but died in brushes, likely due to better drying between uses. "Brushes dry faster, reducing bacterial survival," Langsrud explained.

Egert advocates ditching sponges entirely. "A brush is better-it holds fewer bacteria, dries quicker, and is easier to clean," he said. If you prefer sponges, he recommends weekly replacement or disinfection via dishwasher or microwave (steaming for one minute). Boiling water and disinfectants can also reduce pathogens, though resistant strains may persist.

Practical tips to limit bacterial growth

  • Replace sponges weekly or after heavy use.
  • Disinfect sponges in a dishwasher or microwave (steam for one minute).
  • Squeeze out moisture and store sponges outside the sink to dry.
  • Avoid wiping raw meat juices with sponges to prevent pathogen transfer.
  • Consider switching to brushes, which harbor fewer bacteria and dry faster.

"For a healthy person, sponge bacteria are usually harmless. But if pathogens like Salmonella are introduced, the sponge's structure lets them multiply," Quinlan warned.

Related posts

Report a Problem

Help us improve by reporting any issues with this response.

Problem Reported

Thank you for your feedback

Ed