Ask Onix
Karnataka legislature approves hate speech prevention bill
The southern Indian state of Karnataka has passed legislation targeting hate speech and hate crimes, aiming to reduce communal tensions. The bill awaits the governor's approval to become law.
Rise in hate speech fuels legislative action
Karnataka's government, led by the Congress party, argues the bill is necessary to address a surge in hate speech, particularly against minorities. A 2024 report found a 74% increase in hate speech targeting Muslims, with spikes during national elections.
Social media and television have amplified divisive rhetoric, prompting calls for stronger legal measures. India lacks a federal hate speech law, though existing provisions criminalize speech that incites religious enmity or offends religious sentiments.
Key provisions and controversies
The Karnataka Hate Speech and Hate Crimes (Prevention) Bill, 2025 defines hate speech as any public expression-verbal, written, or digital-that targets individuals or groups. It also classifies the communication of hate speech as a hate crime, regardless of whether it leads to violence.
The bill grants the state government authority to order digital platforms to remove content deemed hateful, a power currently reserved for the federal government. Penalties include non-bailable jail terms of one to seven years and fines up to 50,000 rupees ($550). Repeat offenders face harsher punishments.
"Hate speech can escalate into real-world violence, and this law aims to close existing legal gaps," Karnataka Home Minister G Parameshwara told the state assembly.
Critics warn of overreach and misuse
The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), which opposes the bill in Karnataka but governs nationally, argues the law is unnecessary and could stifle free speech. Opposition leader R Ashoka claimed it would "take away constitutional rights and imprison opposition leaders and journalists."
Legal experts echo concerns about potential misuse. Supreme Court lawyer Sanjay Hegde noted that political parties often label opponents' speech as hateful, risking arbitrary enforcement. Alok Prasanna Kumar, co-founder of the Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy, warned of "enormous scope for misuse" despite the law's good intentions.
Siddharth Narrain, an assistant professor at the National Law School of India University, pointed to a blurred line between hate speech and hate crimes in the bill. He argued that while hate speech should be prosecuted for its potential to incite violence, the current wording treats communication itself as a crime even without violent outcomes.
Debate over definitions and enforcement
Experts cite a 2015 Supreme Court ruling that laws criminalizing speech must be precise to avoid a "chilling effect" on free expression. Critics argue the bill's broad definitions could lead to self-censorship.
BJP leaders and activists have urged the governor to refer the bill to the Indian president for review. Social activist Girish Bhardwaj contended the law "regulates citizens rather than hate speech," granting excessive discretion to police and administrative officers.
"The first step is the police; the judiciary comes much later. This could push officers to act on political signals rather than independent judgment," Kumar said.
Government defends bill's safeguards
A senior Karnataka government official, speaking anonymously, said the bill empowers police by removing the need for government approval to file chargesheets. "The accused can be tried regardless of political affiliation," the official said, adding that courts would hold police accountable for inaction or errors.
Neighboring Telangana, also governed by Congress, has signaled plans to introduce a similar bill. The debate highlights broader tensions between curbing hate speech and protecting civil liberties in India's diverse and polarized landscape.
