Ask Onix
Australian teens challenge social media ban in High Court
Two 15-year-old Australians, backed by a digital rights group, have filed a legal challenge against a new law banning under-16s from social media, arguing it violates their right to free communication and fails to address the root causes of online harm.
Law takes effect in December
From 10 December, platforms like Meta, TikTok, and YouTube must prevent Australians under 16 from holding accounts. The government argues the measure protects children from harmful content and manipulative algorithms, but critics say it misses the mark.
Teens argue for better solutions
Noah Jones, one of the plaintiffs, told the BBC that social media companies should focus on removing predators and harmful content rather than enforcing age restrictions. "They should be using their resources to get rid of the bad actors, not just avoiding fines," he said.
Macy Newland, the second teen behind the challenge, acknowledged issues with social media but emphasized its benefits, including education, communication, and social inclusion. She called for improved online safety education and age verification instead of a blanket ban.
"Democracy doesn't start at 16 as this law says it will."
Macy Newland, plaintiff
Government stands firm
Communications Minister Anika Wells dismissed the legal challenge, declaring the government would not back down. "We will not be intimidated by threats, legal challenges, or big tech," she told parliament. "We will stand firm on behalf of Australian parents."
Mixed reactions to the policy
While polls show most Australian adults support the ban, mental health advocates warn it could isolate children from peer connections or push them toward less-regulated online spaces. Tech companies, tasked with enforcement, have also opposed the measure.
The case, filed by the Digital Freedom Project-a group led by New South Wales parliamentarian John Ruddick-will be heard in the High Court.
