Ask Onix
The historical shift in childbirth positions
For millennia, women across cultures gave birth in upright positions-squatting, kneeling, or using birthing stools-until a 17th-century French physician upended tradition. Today, most women in hospitals deliver on their backs, a practice critics argue prioritizes convenience over physiology.
The case for upright birth
Squatting alone can expand the pelvic diameter by at least 2.5 cm (1 inch), while gravity assists the baby's descent. Janet Balaskas, founder of the UK's Active Birth Centre, notes that upright positions were universal before industrialization. Her 1982 manifesto condemned recumbent birth as "illogical," turning a natural process into a medicalized event.
A 2013 review of 25 studies involving over 5,200 women found upright births reduced cesarean rates, epidural use, and neonatal intensive care admissions. Benefits included shorter labor, more efficient contractions, and better fetal oxygenation, though some studies reported increased blood loss in high-risk cases.
The French influence: Mauriceau and Louis XIV
Hannah Dahlen, a midwifery professor at Western Sydney University, traces the shift to François Mauriceau, a 17th-century French obstetrician who deemed pregnancy an illness. His 1668 treatise advocated bed births for the comfort of male physicians, coinciding with a push to replace midwives with male surgeons.
Historian Lauren Dundes suggests another Frenchman-King Louis XIV-may have accelerated the trend. Frustrated by obstructed views of births on stools, the king allegedly promoted reclining positions. While his direct influence is debated, the practice aligned with the era's medicalization of childbirth.
Modern maternity care: Progress and challenges
Balaskas highlights a paradox: While "active birth" principles-encouraging mobility and upright positions-have gained traction, cesarean rates continue to climb. UK guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) now advise against supine positions in the second stage of labor, urging women to adopt comfortable alternatives.
A 2011 study by Dahlen's team found women in birth centers (equipped with stools, balls, and pools) were three times more likely to use upright positions than those in delivery wards, where hospital beds dominate. Yet systemic barriers persist, including limited access to midwife-led care and cultural misrepresentations of birth in media.
Knowledge as empowerment
Eileen Hutton, a midwifery researcher at McMaster University, stresses the need for public education to counter misinformation. "Portrayals of birth in film and television often misrepresent the process," she says. "Providing accurate information helps women advocate for their preferences."
"Birth has become institutionalized, with options like home birth declining. Women deserve environments that support their instincts."
Janet Balaskas, Active Birth Centre
As awareness grows, advocates argue for policies that prioritize physiological birth-restoring agency to women while acknowledging the complexities of modern obstetrics.
