Ask Onix
Diverging demands complicate war's end
After 16 days of airstrikes, neither the United States nor Iran shows signs of backing down, as both sides insist on terms the other refuses to accept. While global pressure mounts for a ceasefire, the gap between Washington's demands and Tehran's red lines keeps widening.
Trump's shifting objectives
U.S. President Donald Trump's goals in the conflict have appeared inconsistent, ranging from merely curbing Iran's nuclear program to demanding full capitulation to American and Israeli security demands. The most ambitious-and least likely-outcome sought by Washington and its allies is the collapse of Iran's theocratic regime, replaced by a democratic government that poses no regional threat.
So far, Iran has neither surrendered nor collapsed, though its military has suffered heavy losses from sustained precision bombing. Indirect negotiations mediated by Oman in February showed progress on nuclear issues, with Tehran reportedly willing to make significant concessions to assure the world it is not pursuing nuclear weapons. However, Iran refused to discuss limits on its ballistic missile program or its support for regional proxies like Yemen's Houthis and Lebanon's Hezbollah.
Iran's stance: survival over surrender
Iran's leadership, now under new Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei-son of the late hardliner Ayatollah Ali Khamenei-has signaled no willingness to alter its regional policies or domestic repression. Tehran's conditions for ending the war include ironclad guarantees against future attacks and reparations for the billions in damages caused by U.S. and Israeli airstrikes-demands it likely knows are non-starters.
Geography and time are on Iran's side. Its extensive Gulf coastline and control over the Strait of Hormuz, through which 20% of global oil shipments pass, allow it to disrupt shipping indefinitely. Tehran also appears confident it can outlast Trump politically, betting on "strategic patience" to wear down U.S. resolve.
Global reluctance to intervene
Trump's call for international support in securing the Strait has met with resistance. The UK, European nations, and other allies, who opposed the war from the outset, are hesitant to deploy their navies to escort commercial vessels through the volatile waterway. Meanwhile, Gulf Arab states-Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Qatar, Bahrain, Kuwait, and Oman-have faced near-daily drone and missile attacks despite their neutrality. On Monday alone, Saudi Arabia intercepted over 60 projectiles targeting its territory.
"A red line has been crossed. There is zero trust between us and Tehran, and we cannot have normal relations with them after this."
Gulf official
Israel's uncompromising position
Of the three primary combatants-the U.S., Iran, and Israel-Israel appears the least eager to end the conflict. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government views Iran's ballistic missile program and nuclear ambitions as existential threats. Israeli airstrikes have targeted missile stockpiles, command centers, and Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) bases, aiming to inflict lasting damage.
Before the war, Iran boasted a sophisticated domestic missile and drone industry, supplying Russia with Shahed drones used in Ukraine. It had also enriched uranium to 60% purity-far exceeding levels needed for civilian nuclear power. For Israel, these twin capabilities are unacceptable, and Netanyahu's government is determined to ensure Iran pays a heavy price for rebuilding them.
Economic and political pressures mount
With global oil prices rising and the Strait of Hormuz partially blocked, domestic unease in the U.S. is growing over another costly Middle Eastern conflict. Trump faces increasing pressure to withdraw, but declaring victory would be difficult if Iran's regime emerges unbroken and defiant. For now, the war grinds on, with no clear path to peace in sight.
