Ask Onix
Three weeks into US-Israeli campaign, mixed signals emerge
Three weeks after the United States and Israel launched joint military action against Iran, the conflict remains shrouded in ambiguity, with President Donald Trump's public remarks often at odds with developments on the ground.
Trump declares progress, but military activity persists
President Trump described the war as "very complete, pretty much" in recent statements, yet American forces continue to deploy to the region. A Marine expeditionary unit is en route, while US and Israeli airstrikes and missile attacks on Iranian targets show no signs of slowing. Despite claims the conflict is "winding down," military operations remain active.
Strait of Hormuz remains a flashpoint
The strategic waterway, through which 20% of global oil exports pass, remains a critical point of contention. Trump called reopening the strait a "simple military manoeuvre," yet only vessels approved by Iran are currently navigating the route. Meanwhile, Iranian drones and missiles continue to target regional sites, including the joint US-UK base on Diego Garcia.
Escalation threats and shifting objectives
In a Truth Social post on Saturday, Trump issued a 48-hour ultimatum to Iran, warning that failure to "fully open" the Strait of Hormuz without threats would result in strikes on Iranian power plants, starting with the largest facilities. The day prior, he outlined a list of US military objectives, including degrading Iran's military, dismantling its nuclear program, and protecting regional allies-but notably omitted securing the strait, arguing other nations should bear that responsibility.
"If I were sending ground troops to Iran, I certainly wouldn't tell you."
Donald Trump, US President
Trump's latest objectives suggest the US could end the conflict with Iran's current leadership intact, its oil exports flowing, and its control over the Strait of Hormuz preserved-a resolution at odds with earlier demands for "unconditional surrender."
Ground forces deployment fuels speculation
US military movements have intensified speculation about potential next steps. A Marine expeditionary unit of 2,500 troops, along with supporting ships and aircraft, departed Japan last week and is expected to arrive in the Middle East soon. A second Marine force of similar size left California, with an estimated mid-April arrival.
Analysts suggest the US may be preparing to seize Kharg Island, Iran's primary oil export terminal. Capturing the 21-square-kilometre island could cripple Iran's oil revenue, forcing concessions. However, Trump denied plans to send ground troops, stating, "If I were, I certainly wouldn't tell you."
Iran issues stark warning over potential escalation
Iran's state media responded to the threat of an attack on Kharg Island by vowing to destabilize the Red Sea, another critical shipping route, and target energy infrastructure across the region. The warning highlights the risks of further escalation, which could expose US forces to intensified Iranian retaliation.
Congress reacts cautiously to $200bn funding request
The Trump administration is reportedly preparing to request $200 billion in emergency funding from Congress to sustain the military campaign. The proposal has drawn skepticism, even from Republican allies.
"We're talking about boots on the ground. We're talking about that kind of extended activity. They have got a whole lot more briefing and a whole lot more explaining to do on how we're going to pay for it, and what's the mission here."
Chip Roy, Republican Congressman (Texas)
The conflict appears to have reached a crossroads, with its future trajectory unclear. As military actions continue and political rhetoric evolves, the "fog of war" obscures the path forward for both policymakers and the public.
