Ask Onix
Undercover probe exposes fake asylum claims industry in UK
An investigation by The Meta Times has uncovered a network of advisers and lawyers allegedly helping asylum seekers fabricate evidence to support false claims in the UK. Techniques include staging political protests, faking medical conditions, and coaching applicants to pose as LGBTQ+ or atheists.
How the system is exploited
During an undercover operation in east London, a reporter posing as a Bangladeshi student was offered guidance on how to deceive UK immigration authorities. Zahid Hasan Akhand, who identified himself as a barrister, outlined three fraudulent routes to asylum: claiming persecution for sexual orientation, religious beliefs, or political activism.
Akhand, who qualified as a barrister in 2022 but is not licensed to practice, proposed a £1,500 legal fee to prepare applications and conduct mock interviews. He also suggested additional payments of £2,000-£3,000 to create supporting evidence, including social media posts, fake news articles, and staged relationships with same-sex partners.
Fabricating evidence
For those claiming to be atheists, Akhand advised posting inflammatory content about Islam on social media to provoke threats, which could then be used as evidence. He offered introductions to atheist organizations in the UK and Bangladesh that would publish articles for a fee, even suggesting the use of AI tools like ChatGPT to generate content.
For LGBTQ+ claims, he proposed arranging membership in gay clubs and providing a fake partner to submit a supporting letter. "Most of the people there are not gay," he admitted, but insisted the approach would avoid detection.
"If you listen and get the evidence arranged properly, it will be successful."
Zahid Hasan Akhand
Legal and ethical concerns
Akhand, who is listed as a non-practicing barrister, denied wrongdoing, stating the meeting was merely introductory and that he did not provide regulated immigration advice. He also claimed his affiliation with Lextel Solicitors had ended years earlier, though the firm confirmed he was not an employee but had not formally resigned.
The investigation revealed that Akhand is not the only adviser involved in such schemes. Between 2018 and 2021, another Bangladeshi lawyer allegedly helped file multiple fraudulent asylum claims, many of which succeeded. These claims often combined fabricated atheist and LGBTQ+ identities, supported by articles on sham news websites created by associates.
Staged protests and medical fraud
Some applicants submitted photos from political protests staged solely to generate evidence. Others were coached to visit doctors and feign depression or HIV to obtain medical records supporting their claims. One adviser even instructed an applicant to cry during Home Office interviews, saying, "She told me to cry. I replied, 'I can't cry.'"
Systemic vulnerabilities
The investigation highlights weaknesses in the UK asylum system, including reliance on easily fabricated evidence and limited verification mechanisms. Bangladesh's paper-based court records, for example, make it difficult to disprove false lawsuits cited in applications.
Advisers also exploit gaps in digital verification, using plagiarized content on sham websites and coaching applicants to memorize answers to common interview questions. One adviser provided a sample questionnaire to help applicants prepare for Home Office assessments.
