Ask Onix
Undercover probe exposes fake asylum claims industry
A BBC investigation has uncovered a network of legal advisers and law firms charging migrants thousands of pounds to fabricate gay asylum claims in the UK. The findings reveal how visa overstayers are coached to invent stories, forge evidence, and deceive authorities to secure residency.
How the deception works
Undercover reporters posing as Pakistani and Bangladeshi students with expiring visas were offered step-by-step guidance to falsify asylum applications. Advisers promised to create fabricated evidence, including photographs at LGBT events, fake medical reports, and letters from supposed partners.
One adviser, Tanisa Khan, told a reporter: "There is nobody who is real. There is only one way out in order to live here now and that is the very method everyone is adopting." She charged £2,500 for her services, warning the fee could rise if appeals were needed.
"You are the one who has to go and take the exam. I am here to prepare everything for you but ultimately it is you who has to go there."
Tanisa Khan, unregulated immigration adviser
Sophisticated tactics to evade detection
Advisers detailed how to navigate Home Office interviews, emphasizing memorized scripts and staged evidence. Khan instructed the reporter to attend LGBT events, buy tickets, and submit photos as "proof" of a gay identity. She even offered to provide a letter from a fictitious partner claiming a sexual relationship.
Another adviser, Aqeel Abbasi of Connaught Law, quoted £7,000 to guide a reporter through the process, including advice on visiting gay clubs and finding a fake partner. When the reporter mentioned a wife in Pakistan, Abbasi suggested claiming UK society's openness allowed for both a wife and a male partner.
Scale of the problem
Home Office data shows Pakistani nationals accounted for 42% of LGBT-based asylum claims in 2023, despite representing just 6% of overall asylum applications. Nearly two-thirds of such claims were initially approved, though experts warn fabricated cases undermine genuine applicants.
Community groups like Worcester LGBT, which claims Home Office recognition, were found hosting meetings where attendees admitted most were not gay. One attendee, Zeeshan, told the BBC: "Nobody is a gay here. Not even 0.01% are gay."
Legal and ethical concerns
Immigration lawyer Ana Gonzalez condemned the practice, stating: "People like that are just really making things harder for the legitimate asylum seekers and refugees out there." She noted that LGBT claims rely heavily on subjective testimony, making them easier to fabricate than claims involving physical evidence like torture.
Tanisa Khan denied wrongdoing, blaming communication issues for "misunderstandings." Mazedul Hasan Shakil, a paralegal linked to Worcester LGBT, said he passed the reporter's details to Khan without suspecting fraud. Connaught Law has not commented on Abbasi's actions.
Government and political response
The Home Office reiterated that deception in asylum claims is a criminal offense, punishable by imprisonment and deportation. A spokesperson called misuse of the system "deplorable" but emphasized robust safeguards to detect fraud.
Labour MP Jo White urged police to investigate, while Conservative shadow justice secretary Nick Timothy called for dismantling the "open secret" of human rights laws enabling such abuse. Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood's recent reforms, introducing 30-month reviews for asylum cases, were dismissed by Khan as irrelevant to her methods.
A personal account
Ali, a Pakistani student who overstayed his visa, described being advised by a lawyer to fake depression and attend Pride marches to support a fraudulent gay asylum claim. Despite spending over £10,000, his application failed, and he was barred from rejoining his wife in the UK. Three of his friends, however, succeeded in obtaining asylum through similar deception.
"They even got married in Pakistan and brought their wives here and now they have children."
Ali, failed asylum applicant
