Ask Onix
Veterans condemn Trump's claim on NATO allies' role in Afghanistan
Former British servicemen and families of fallen soldiers have sharply criticized US President Donald Trump for suggesting America's NATO allies avoided frontline combat in Afghanistan. The remarks, made in a recent interview, have reignited anger over the sacrifices made by coalition forces during the 20-year conflict.
A life altered by war
Andy Reid, a British veteran, was three months into his deployment in Helmand Province when his patrol triggered a Taliban improvised explosive device (IED). The blast cost him both legs and an arm. Recalling the moment, Reid described lying on his back, engulfed in dust, with numbness spreading through his body. "I looked down and couldn't see my legs," he said. His account mirrors the experiences of thousands of British troops injured or killed in the war, which claimed 457 UK service personnel.
Frontline realities disputed
Trump's assertion that NATO allies "stayed a little back" from combat zones has drawn particular scorn. Reid, who worked alongside US soldiers in explosive ordnance disposal teams, rejected the claim outright. "If they were on the front line, and we were stood next to them, then clearly we were on the front line as well," he said. He demanded a formal apology for what he called "disrespectful, inappropriate, and unexpected" comments.
Allies' contributions under scrutiny
The UK deployed the second-largest contingent in Afghanistan, peaking at 11,000 troops in 2011. British forces faced some of the fiercest fighting, particularly in Helmand Province, where IEDs inflicted devastating casualties. Ulster Unionist politician Andy Allen, who lost his right leg in a 2008 attack, emphasized that NATO members served alongside American troops in high-risk zones. "It was the front line where I was injured," he said, vowing to write to the White House to correct the record.
Families of the fallen react
Monica Kershaw, whose 19-year-old son Christopher was killed in a 2008 IED strike, called Trump's remarks "hurtful" and "unacceptable." Six British soldiers died in the attack, which occurred just weeks into Christopher's first deployment. "He was on the front line," she said, adding that the soldiers were there at the request of a US president. "Why were they coming back in wooden boxes?"
Diane Dernie, mother of Ben Parkinson-the most severely injured British survivor of the war-echoed the outrage. Parkinson, who lost both legs and suffered extensive injuries in a 2006 mine blast, served from forward operating bases near combat zones. "To say they played about behind the front lines-of course he's angry," she said.
International backlash
Trump's comments are not the first time his administration has questioned NATO allies' contributions. Last year, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth suggested the ISAF (International Security Assistance Force) badge worn by coalition troops stood for "I saw Americans fighting." US Navy veteran Shawn VanDiver, who now aids Afghan wartime allies, called the president's remarks "just not true." "We could not have accomplished what we did without them," he said, expressing regret to bereaved British families.
In Canada, which lost 158 soldiers in the conflict, Deputy Mayor Michael Akpata of LaSalle, Ontario, condemned the comments as "disheartening." Akpata, who served in Afghanistan in 2007, said Trump's words "belittle" the sacrifices of Canadian troops. "We lost 22 young Canadians on my tour," he said. "Their blood, sweat, and tears represent Canada's commitment to global stability."
Article 5 and the alliance's foundation
The US invoked NATO's Article 5-the collective defense clause-for the first time after the 9/11 attacks, leading to a multinational response in Afghanistan. Alongside the UK and Canada, allies like Denmark and Estonia contributed troops, enduring heavy casualties in regions like Helmand. Critics argue Trump's remarks undermine the alliance's shared burden, particularly as NATO prepares to mark its 75th anniversary.
