Ask Onix
US president weighs in on Iran's leadership transition
President Donald Trump has publicly stated his intention to influence who succeeds Iran's late Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, framing the decision as part of a broader strategy to reshape the country's governance. The remarks, made in interviews with Axios and Reuters, underscore Trump's willingness to intervene in Iran's internal affairs as the regime grapples with an unprecedented leadership vacuum following the assassination of Khamenei and other senior figures.
Trump's conditions: surrender and a 'great' leader
Trump declared that he would only endorse a successor who meets his criteria, stating he seeks an "unconditional surrender" from Iran and a leader who is "great and acceptable." He drew parallels to Venezuela, where the U.S. facilitated the removal of Nicolás Maduro and installed Delcy Rodríguez, who now collaborates with Washington. "I have to be involved in the appointment," Trump said, citing the Venezuela operation as a model for Iran.
His comments reflect a shift from outright regime change to a more targeted approach-reshaping Iran's leadership while preserving its theocratic structure. However, the president's stance has dashed hopes among some Iranians that the death of Khamenei might pave the way for a more moderate or democratic system.
Hardliners dominate as succession process unfolds
One week into the crisis, Iran's hardline factions, known as Principlists, appear to retain control over the succession process. The country's leadership is deeply divided between reformers, pragmatists, and hardliners, but all factions share a common goal: preserving the Islamic Republic's survival.
Mojtaba Khamenei, the 56-year-old son of the late supreme leader, is widely seen as the frontrunner. Trump explicitly ruled him out, calling him "unacceptable." Tehran responded sharply, with the conservative Mehr News Agency condemning the remarks as evidence of "the enemy's malicious objectives." The interim Leadership Council, now overseeing governance, vowed that Iranians would "never allow" foreign interference in their affairs.
Succession process shrouded in secrecy and chaos
Iran's process for selecting a supreme leader is typically opaque, but the current turmoil-marked by airstrikes and political infighting-has made it even more unpredictable. Reports suggest the Assembly of Experts, an 88-member clerical body responsible for choosing the leader, may have already convened virtually after its meeting sites in Tehran and Qom were bombed.
Mehdi Khalaji, a senior fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, told the BBC that the interim council's recent assertion of authority over war and peace decisions indicates the succession is still unresolved. Khalaji, who authored a biography of Khamenei, described Mojtaba as a hardline figure aligned with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) but lacking support within the clerical establishment.
Other potential candidates include Hassan Khomeini, the grandson of Iran's revolutionary founder, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, who is seen as a relative moderate. Alireza Arafi, a senior jurist on the interim council, has also been mentioned, though his lack of security experience is viewed as a liability. Some analysts speculate the Assembly of Experts may opt for a leadership council rather than a single successor, given the current instability.
Historical grievances fuel resistance to US influence
Trump's remarks have reignited long-standing Iranian suspicions of American interference. The 1953 CIA-backed coup that overthrew Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh and installed Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi remains a defining trauma in Iran's collective memory. The shah's subsequent overthrow in the 1979 revolution was driven in part by anti-Western sentiment, and any perceived foreign meddling in the succession process risks provoking a backlash.
The IRGC, which dominates Iran's security and economic apparatus, has signaled that any successor will be a target. Israel has also warned that it will treat the new leader as an "unequivocal target," further complicating the transition.
Uncertainty looms as Trump's strategy evolves
Trump's shifting rhetoric-from advocating regime change to focusing on leadership selection-reflects the fluid nature of his approach. "Most of the people we had in mind are dead," he remarked, hinting at the challenges of identifying a compliant successor. Meanwhile, Iran's leadership remains in flux, with no clear timeline for announcing a new supreme leader.
As the crisis deepens, the risk of prolonged instability grows, with implications for regional security and Iran's internal dynamics. For now, the only certainty is that the battle for Iran's future is far from over.
