Ask Onix
Court overturns acquittal, imposes fines
Singapore's High Court has reversed an earlier ruling and fined three women S$3,000 (US$2,300) each for organizing an unauthorized procession in support of Palestinians during the Gaza conflict.
Background of the case
In February 2024, activists Mossammad Sobikun Nahar, Siti Amirah Mohamed Asrori, and Kokila Annamalai led approximately 70 participants on a walk from a shopping mall to the presidential office. Their aim was to deliver letters urging the prime minister to sever ties with Israel.
Participants carried umbrellas featuring watermelon designs, a symbol commonly associated with pro-Palestinian movements. The procession took place amid heightened tensions over Israel's military actions in Gaza.
Initial acquittal and prosecution appeal
Last October, a lower court acquitted the women, accepting their defense that they had taken precautions to avoid breaking the law. The judge noted that the group had walked on public roads and were unaware the route near the presidential compound was restricted.
Following the acquittal, Annamalai told the BBC the decision would inspire other activists in Singapore. However, prosecutors appealed, leading to Thursday's High Court ruling.
High Court's decision
The High Court overturned the acquittal, stating the women should have sought clarification on whether their planned route was permissible. Local media reported the judge's opinion that further inquiries were necessary to comply with public assembly laws.
"There is a long fight ahead towards democratisation in Singapore, and acts of civil disobedience have an important part to play. We should have every right to walk to the Prime Minister's Office at the Istana to deliver letters from ordinary Singaporeans."
Kokila Annamalai, activist
Singapore's stance on public demonstrations
The city-state enforces strict regulations on protests, with authorities effectively banning gatherings related to the Israel-Gaza war. Officials argue these measures are essential to preserve social harmony, though critics contend they suppress free expression and civic engagement.
