Ask Onix
Samsung's leadership saga concludes with legal exoneration
Seoul's High Court cleared Lee Jae-yong of fraud charges in July 2025, closing a ten-year chapter of bribery trials, imprisonment, and family infighting that reshaped South Korea's most powerful conglomerate.
Dynasty under scrutiny
Lee, 57, is the grandson of Samsung's founder and has long been viewed as South Korea's de facto tech monarch. His legal troubles began in 2015 when prosecutors accused him of bribing a presidential confidante to secure political backing for a merger that would cement his control over Samsung Electronics-the group's most valuable asset.
The merger between Samsung C&T and Cheil Industries was allegedly engineered through stock manipulation and accounting fraud, allowing Lee to acquire a dominant stake in the combined entity. While he denied fraud, a 2017 conviction for bribery triggered mass protests in Seoul and contributed to the impeachment of then-President Park Geun-hye.
Family feuds and fragile succession
Samsung's leadership has been a family affair since its founding as a grocery store in 1938. The Lee dynasty expanded the business into memory chips, construction, and consumer electronics, but maintaining control required intricate corporate maneuvers-many of which landed Lee Jae-yong in legal crosshairs.
His father, Lee Kun-hee, transformed Samsung from a domestic enterprise into a global powerhouse. Yet when a 2014 heart attack left him incapacitated, the succession plan was far from settled. The family faced a $10 billion inheritance tax bill, and selling shares to cover it risked diluting their influence over the sprawling empire of 60-plus subsidiaries.
Critics questioned Lee Jae-yong's leadership, citing his quiet demeanor and the failure of his e-Samsung venture during the dot-com crash. Some argued his sister was better suited to lead, while others noted his lack of the ruthlessness his father displayed.
Generational rifts
The Lee family's history is marked by succession disputes. In 1976, Lee Kun-hee was chosen over his two older brothers to lead Samsung, sparking a rift that resurfaced decades later. In 2012, Lee Jae-yong's uncle, Lee Maeng-hee, sued to reclaim what he claimed was his rightful inheritance, threatening to unravel the conglomerate's structure. Courts ultimately dismissed the case, but the conflict underscored the risks of unclear succession.
Earlier, in 2008, both Lee Jae-yong and his father resigned after a whistleblower exposed a slush fund used for bribes. Though Lee Kun-hee later returned as chairman after a presidential pardon, the scandal raised doubts about the family's grip on power.
A new direction
Lee Jae-yong's acquittal in 2025 marked a turning point. During court proceedings, he pledged to break with tradition, vowing not to pass managerial control to his children. "There will be no more controversies related to succession," he stated.
The announcement signals a potential shift for South Korea's chaebols-family-run conglomerates that dominate the economy. Analysts speculate Samsung may now adopt a professional management model, though the Lee family's influence remains substantial.
What's next for Samsung?
With Lee Jae-yong's legal battles resolved, attention turns to Samsung's future leadership. The conglomerate's next chapter could redefine corporate governance in South Korea, where family dynasties have long dictated business strategy.
"The siblings were all angry at each other, and I think that's partly why [Lee Kun-hee] made the succession line very clear for his children."
Jaeyeon Lee, reporter at Hankyoreh
