Ask Onix
Russia's unapologetic rhetoric in 2026
Russia's foreign policy and public discourse in 2026 remain marked by defiance, with officials and cultural figures embracing an uncompromising stance. A remark by folk singer Nadezhda Babkina-"Anyone who doesn't like that can go and poison themselves"-has become emblematic of the country's unrepentant attitude amid its prolonged war in Ukraine.
The war's toll and escalation
Four years into its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Russia shows no signs of de-escalation. This week, Moscow launched another large-scale missile and drone strike across Ukraine, coinciding with the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum, an event intended to project Russia's global relevance. Despite the war's economic and military costs, the Kremlin continues to press its demands, insisting Ukraine cede control of the entire Donbas region.
Russian forces have suffered heavy losses, and the conflict has exacted a steep economic toll. Sanctions, a growing budget deficit, and stagnant growth have strained the country, yet the Kremlin has responded with further escalation. Recent air raids on Ukrainian cities underscore this strategy, though Moscow frames these actions as retaliatory, citing a Ukrainian strike on a college dormitory in occupied Starobilsk that killed 21 students. Kyiv claims the target was a Russian military drone unit's headquarters but has not confirmed whether it was the same building.
Shifting perceptions in Moscow
Inside Russia, a rare public debate is emerging about the war's sustainability. In a journal linked to the foreign policy establishment, political scientist Vasily Kashin argued that Russia's goal of eliminating Ukraine's government is unachievable without a full military occupation-a scenario he deemed impossible. Pro-Kremlin media have also hosted discussions on whether to end the war, with some analysts suggesting that even defeat could lead to future reforms.
However, such discourse remains tightly controlled. An article in Moskovsky Komsomolets exploring the idea of ending the war without achieving its goals was swiftly removed from the publication's website, replaced with a "404 error." The incident highlights the limits of Russia's internal debate.
The Trump factor and fading optimism
Last year, Russian officials expressed confidence that then-U.S. President Donald Trump would broker a peace deal on Moscow's terms. The so-called "spirit of Anchorage," referencing a 2025 U.S.-Russia summit, fueled hopes of a favorable resolution. Yet no agreement materialized, and Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov recently dismissed the phrase as irrelevant, signaling waning optimism.
Putin's frustration appears to stem from multiple sources: the war's protracted duration, battlefield setbacks, and Ukraine's ability to strike deep inside Russian territory. Drone attacks have targeted oil refineries and energy infrastructure, while a recent strike near Moscow exposed vulnerabilities in the capital's air defenses. The Kremlin's response-scaling back the annual Victory Day parade-reflects growing unease.
Forum and future signals
At this year's St. Petersburg International Economic Forum, Putin is expected to address international media and reiterate his criticisms of the West. While Western investors and politicians have largely boycotted the event, organizers claim delegations from over 130 countries will attend. Yet, as one official put it, "Russia is what it is"-a country undeterred by its isolation or the war's costs.
For now, there are no indications Putin will soften his stance. The war grinds on, and Russia's defiance remains its defining posture in 2026.
