Ask Onix
Middle East turmoil revives Europe's energy vulnerabilities
The escalating conflict in the Middle East has thrust Europe back into an all-too-familiar crisis: soaring energy prices and deep divisions over how to secure stable supplies. Four years after Russia's invasion of Ukraine triggered a scramble to reduce dependence on Moscow, the continent now faces a stark reality-its energy security remains fragile, and old dependencies have merely shifted.
From Russia to the US: A precarious pivot
In 2022, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen condemned Russia's weaponization of energy, declaring, "This is a war on our economy, our values, and our future." The EU swiftly cut ties with Russian suppliers, slashing oil imports to just 2% of its total-flowing only to Hungary and Slovakia-and pledging to end all Russian gas imports, including liquefied natural gas (LNG), by 2025.
Yet the bloc's rapid diversification came with a new vulnerability: reliance on the United States. Today, the U.S. supplies 57% of Europe's LNG, with energy-hungry Germany sourcing 96% of its LNG from American terminals. This shift has left Europe exposed to geopolitical whims-particularly under President Donald Trump, who has used energy as leverage. In July, Trump threatened the EU with 30% tariffs on exports unless it agreed to a $750 billion deal for U.S. oil, LNG, and nuclear technology. The final agreement, struck at Trump's Scottish golf resort, halved the tariff threat but left the EU in a weakened negotiating position.
"We swore we'd learn. We promised things would change, but here we are."
An anonymous European diplomat
Global markets, local pain
The current crisis stems from Iran's blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, a critical chokepoint for 20% of global oil supplies, following U.S. and Israeli strikes on Tehran. Though Europe imports little Middle Eastern oil directly, the disruption sent prices surging-oil by 8% and European gas by 20%-highlighting the continent's exposure to global volatility.
Dan Marks, an energy security specialist at the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI), warns that while Europe can outbid poorer nations for supplies, the cost is crippling its competitiveness. "This choice between Russian energy and global market volatility is a very bad choice for Europe," he said. Long-term solutions, he argues, require stockpiling and reducing consumption-but such measures demand unity and foresight.
Norway's limits and Arctic dilemmas
Norway, now Europe's largest gas supplier, provides a third of the EU's annual consumption and half of the UK's. But Oslo has warned it is operating near maximum capacity, complicating efforts to boost supplies. The EU's climate goals-including a ban on Arctic oil and gas development-clash with Norway's lobbying to expand production, arguing that Russia's Arctic LNG plans make European restraint self-defeating.
Green policies under fire
The crisis has reignited debates over the EU's Emissions Trading System (ETS), which imposes carbon costs on polluting industries. Some leaders, like Italy's Giorgia Meloni, demand suspending the ETS for electricity production to ease price pressures, while others, including Spain and Sweden, argue weakening it would reward laggards and penalize green innovators.
Belgium's Prime Minister Bart De Wever sparked outrage by urging normalized relations with Russia for cheaper energy, reflecting a growing divide. "In private, European leaders tell me I'm right, but no one dares say it out loud," he claimed. Meanwhile, Germany's far-right AfD party calls for lifting sanctions on Moscow entirely.
China's head start and Europe's lag
While Europe grapples with short-term fixes, China has raced ahead in electrification, with over 30% of its energy consumption now electric-compared to just 25% in the EU. Beijing's strategy, designed for moments like this, prioritizes energy security alongside emissions targets, resulting in over half of new car sales being electric.
Georg Zachmann, an energy policy expert at Bruegel, calls Europe's slow progress "madness," pointing to underutilized solar potential in southern Italy. The EU's legally binding target to cut emissions by 90% by 2040 faces skepticism over feasibility, with leaders wary of voter backlash over costs.
Brexit shadows and mutual interests
Energy cooperation between the EU and UK remains hampered by Brexit politics, despite shared economic incentives. The UK's offshore wind fleet and North Sea plans could complement Europe's needs, but disputes over the European Court of Justice's role stall progress. Marks of RUSI notes, "The reality will keep bringing the two parties back together."
Will this crisis be different?
As EU leaders convene in Brussels, the summit's agenda is dominated by short-term relief measures-tax reviews, price caps, and accelerated electrification. Von der Leyen has called for "a comprehensive look at how to reduce people's energy bills," but unity remains elusive.
Marks cautions against expecting transformative change: "Every time there's an oil and gas crisis, everyone thinks it's a turning point. Think back to the 1970s-we're just as exposed as ever." The question now is whether Europe's leaders can muster the courage to break the cycle.
