Ask Onix
Surge of protests in Japan opposes military expansion
Thousands gathered in Tokyo and other major cities under heavy rain this week, holding signs with a simple but powerful message: "No War." The demonstrations mark the largest anti-war protests Japan has seen in decades, sparked by Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi's recent moves to expand the country's military role and lift restrictions on arms exports.
Government defends policy changes amid regional tensions
Takaichi, who took office in October 2025, argues that Japan's security environment has grown increasingly precarious. The government points to an assertive China, an unpredictable North Korea, and a nearby Russia as key factors driving the need for a stronger defense posture. The United States, Japan's closest ally, has also encouraged Tokyo to take a more active role in regional security.
On April 21, the Japanese government lifted a long-standing ban on exporting lethal weapons, a decision it justified as necessary for supporting allies in what it describes as a deteriorating security landscape. The move has intensified public debate over Japan's post-war pacifist identity.
Article 9: A constitutional pillar under scrutiny
Japan's 1947 constitution, drafted in the aftermath of World War II, includes Article 9, a clause that renounces war as a sovereign right and prohibits the maintenance of armed forces for waging war. While the clause has been reinterpreted over the years to allow for self-defense forces, it remains a cornerstone of Japan's pacifist identity.
Critics of Takaichi's policies warn that recent changes risk eroding Article 9's protections. They argue that loosening restrictions on military activities could draw Japan into foreign conflicts, a concern rooted in the country's traumatic history. During World War II, the U.S. dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, killing an estimated 200,000 people by the end of 1945.
"The Japanese constitution, Article 9 in particular, must be protected at all costs. It kept Japan from being drawn into past conflicts like the US-Iran war. Without it, we surely would have entered the war by now,"
Protester at Tokyo demonstration
Generational divide fuels protests
The protests have drawn a diverse crowd, including many young people who feel they have the most at stake in Japan's future. Akari Maezono, a protester in her 30s, expressed frustration over the government's decision-making process.
"I'm angry that these changes could be made without properly listening to us, the public,"
Akari Maezono, protester
Social media platforms like X have played a significant role in organizing demonstrations, with younger Japanese sharing details and mobilizing their peers. Rallies have spread beyond Tokyo to cities such as Osaka, Kyoto, and Fukuoka, with attendance growing each week.
Public opinion split on Japan's military future
While protests highlight strong opposition to military expansion, public opinion in Japan remains divided. Recent polls show conflicting trends: some indicate growing support for a stronger military to address current global threats, while others reveal deep resistance to abandoning pacifist principles.
Supporters of constitutional revisions argue that Article 9, written in the aftermath of defeat, is outdated and overly restrictive. They contend that Japan must adapt to an increasingly unstable world by deterring aggression, supporting allies, and responding proactively to regional crises. For them, strengthening the military is not about rejecting pacifism but ensuring national survival.
Opponents, however, warn that incremental changes could hollow out Article 9's pacifist clause. They emphasize that the constitution represents a moral commitment shaped by the devastation of past wars. Survivors of the Hiroshima atomic bomb, known as hibakusha, have been vocal in their calls for nuclear disarmament and peace.
"Nuclear weapons were used because we went to war. No more war, no more hibakusha,"
Jiro Hamasumi, Hiroshima atomic bomb survivor, at the 2026 Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty review conference
A nation at a crossroads
The protests underscore a broader national debate over Japan's identity. For some, the shift away from pacifism is a necessary evolution in response to global realities. For others, it represents a dangerous departure from the principles that have defined Japan since World War II.
In a Tokyo convenience store, a cashier's remarks captured the divide: "They're always here," he said of the protesters, before adding, "Time for a new Japan."
As Japan grapples with this pivotal moment, the question remains not just what path the country will choose, but how quickly it will embrace change in a society where transformation has historically been slow and deliberate.
