Ask Onix
Ceasefire brings cautious relief to war-weary Iranians
As spring arrives in northwestern Iran, a fragile two-week truce has temporarily eased hostilities, allowing displaced citizens to return home and traffic to resume on key highways. Yet anxiety lingers over the ceasefire's durability and the looming threat of renewed conflict.
Personal accounts of war and fear
A grey-haired banker, recently returned from Turkey, described the airstrikes as largely targeting military sites rather than civilian areas in his northern city. However, his optimism contrasted sharply with the fears of others. An elderly woman in a headscarf voiced dread over the suffering of young Iranians, citing shelling in residential neighborhoods and intimidation by Basij paramilitary forces. "It's all in God's hands," she murmured.
A younger woman in a red puffer jacket dismissed the ceasefire's longevity outright. "Iran will never relinquish control of the Strait of Hormuz," she declared, echoing a sentiment shared by many. Near the border, a man blamed U.S. President Donald Trump for Iran's plight, accusing him of seeking to "swallow" the country.
Infrastructure damage and apocalyptic threats
The journey to Tehran-a 12-hour drive due to closed airports-revealed the war's toll on civilian infrastructure. A critical bridge linking Tabriz to the capital collapsed under missile fire last week, forcing detours onto rural roads. Along the route, flattened barracks of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and damaged factories stood as stark reminders of the conflict's intensity.
Trump's recent warning to Fox Business News underscored the stakes. "We could take out every one of their bridges in one hour," he said, though he claimed the U.S. preferred restraint. Legal scholars have condemned such threats as potential violations of international humanitarian law, while the U.S. and Israel maintain their strikes target only military objectives.
At a historic roadside caravanserai, the juxtaposition of Iran's ancient civilization and modern turmoil was palpable. Women's attire-some veiled, others bare-headed-reflected the legacy of the 2022-2023 "Woman, Life, Freedom" protests, despite ongoing enforcement of strict modesty laws.
Diplomatic efforts and red lines
Banners along highways displayed portraits of Iran's supreme leaders-Khomeini, the late Khamenei, and his injured son Mojtaba-symbolizing the theocracy's struggle to adapt amid war. Behind closed doors, U.S. Vice President JD Vance and Iranian officials, led by hardline Parliamentary Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, engaged in 21 hours of talks in Islamabad, mediated by Pakistan.
Iran's Foreign Ministry spokesman, Esmail Baghaei, outlined Tehran's demands: a "full end to war, lifting of sanctions, and reparations for U.S.-Israeli attacks." Washington, however, has insisted on irreversible concessions, including the dismantling of Iran's nuclear enrichment facilities, surrender of highly enriched uranium, and an end to support for proxies like Hamas and Hezbollah.
Tehran rejected a 20-year moratorium on enrichment, proposing a five-year pause instead, and refused to hand over its 440kg stockpile of highly enriched uranium, offering only to dilute its 60% enriched uranium. Meanwhile, Iran's blockade of the Strait of Hormuz persists, with IRGC commander Ali Abdollahi threatening to halt all Gulf shipping if pressure mounts.
Uncertain future amid mediation
Pakistan's Army Chief, Field Marshall Asim Munir, arrived in Tehran to broker further talks, with a second round expected in Islamabad. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed ongoing discussions, hinting at a possible truce extension. While U.S. officials suggest the worst of the conflict may be over, Iranians remain skeptical, focusing on daily survival under sanctions, internet blackouts, and the aftermath of nationwide protests that left thousands dead.
As mid-April unfolds, the question lingers: Could a deal finally bring the change Iranians seek, or will the cycle of conflict and repression persist?
