Politics

Greenland sovereignty at center of high-stakes US-Denmark talks in Washington

Navigation

Ask Onix

Greenland takes global spotlight as US-Denmark talks begin

US Vice President JD Vance is hosting Denmark's and Greenland's foreign ministers alongside US Secretary of State Marco Rubio at the White House Wednesday, with Greenland's future dominating the agenda. The island's capital, Nuuk, has been gripped by anxiety as digital billboards flash the words "Trump," "Greenland," and "sovereignty" in stark red letters.

Trump's threats raise tensions

Former President Donald Trump has publicly declared his intent to acquire Greenland, stating he would pursue it "the easy way or the hard way." His recent military intervention in Venezuela has amplified concerns among Greenlanders, who fear his rhetoric could translate into action. Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned that any US attempt to seize Greenland by force would rupture NATO, the transatlantic defense alliance.

Greenland, a semi-autonomous Danish territory, holds strategic significance due to its location between North America and Europe. Its vast natural resources, including rare earth minerals critical for high-tech and defense industries, have drawn global interest. Melting Arctic ice is also opening new shipping routes, further heightening its geopolitical value.

Greenlanders reject US control

Public sentiment in Greenland overwhelmingly opposes American ownership. In Nuuk, residents expressed frustration and fear over the escalating tensions. Amelie Zeeb, a local resident, urged Trump to "use both his ears wisely, to listen more and to speak less," emphasizing, "We are not for sale. Our country is not for sale."

Inuit writer and musician Sivnîssoq Rask echoed the sentiment, stating, "My hope is for our country to be independent and well-managed and not be bought." Maria, a mother of a seven-week-old, voiced her concerns: "I worry for the future of my young family. We don't want all this attention here!"

A recent poll found that 85% of Greenlanders reject the idea of becoming part of the United States, despite their desire for independence from Denmark.

NATO allies scramble for solutions

European nations, alarmed by the potential fallout, are proposing military reinforcements in Greenland to deter US aggression. Germany and the UK are leading efforts to bolster NATO's Arctic presence, with discussions including the deployment of troops, warships, aircraft, submarines, and anti-drone capabilities.

"We share the US concerns that this part of Denmark needs better protection. We simply want to improve Greenland's security situation together,"

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz

Patrick Sensburg, chairman of the German Reservists Association, called for stationing a European brigade in Greenland, highlighting Germany's "special responsibility" in the endeavor. The UK is also in talks with allies about potential military deployments, though details remain preliminary.

One proposal gaining traction is a maritime "Arctic Sentry" modeled after NATO's "Baltic Sentry," aimed at protecting underwater infrastructure like pipelines and internet cables, which are vulnerable to hybrid attacks.

Strategic stakes and historical context

Greenland's strategic importance dates back to World War II, when the US occupied the island to prevent Nazi Germany from gaining control. Though post-war attempts to purchase Greenland failed, the 1951 US-Denmark defense agreement allowed the US to maintain military bases, including Pituffik Space Base, a critical radar station.

The island's location near the GIUK gap-a maritime choke point between Greenland, Iceland, and the UK-makes it vital for monitoring Russian and Chinese submarine activity. The US has pressured Denmark to enhance surveillance, with Copenhagen recently pledging $4 billion for Greenland's security, though the Trump administration dismissed the effort as insufficient.

Uncertainty looms over Washington talks

Analysts question whether Wednesday's meeting will yield compromise or confrontation. Julianne Smith, former US ambassador to NATO, called the talks "absolutely critical," warning that the outcome could define US-European relations under Trump's second term. "The real question is whether any of these proposals will satisfy a White House more interested in expanding US territory than securing Greenland," she said.

Ian Lesser, a fellow at the German Marshall Fund, suggested Trump's focus on Greenland may stem from economic interests rather than traditional security concerns. He noted that the Pacific High North, particularly the Bering Strait, is a more sensitive Arctic region for the US, where Russian and American military activities frequently clash.

Greenlandic Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen framed the situation as a "geopolitical crisis," affirming that if forced to choose between the US and Denmark, Greenland would side with Denmark. Sara Olvig of Greenland's Centre for Foreign and Security Policy warned that coercive US action would undermine NATO and global democracy.

Global powers watch closely

Russia and China are closely monitoring the talks, recognizing the broader implications for Arctic dominance. Trump's stance-"We're talking about acquiring, not leasing"-leaves little room for negotiation, raising fears of a destabilizing confrontation.

As the meeting unfolds, Greenlanders and the world await the outcome, with the island's sovereignty and the future of NATO hanging in the balance.

Related posts

Report a Problem

Help us improve by reporting any issues with this response.

Problem Reported

Thank you for your feedback

Ed