Ask Onix
Former FBI chief faces federal charges over Instagram post
James Comey, the former director of the FBI, has been indicted on charges of threatening the life of US President Donald Trump after sharing an image on social media last year. The post featured seashells arranged to form the numbers "86 47," which critics claim was a veiled threat against the 47th president.
Background of the controversy
The image, posted on Comey's Instagram account, showed seashells spelling out "86 47." The term "eighty-six" is slang for "remove" or "eliminate." While Comey maintained he was unaware of the violent connotation, Trump and his administration interpreted the post as a direct threat.
Comey was dismissed by Trump in 2017 following the FBI's investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. Since then, Trump has repeatedly called for Comey's prosecution, and Tuesday's indictment marks the second attempt by the administration to press charges against him.
Charges and legal reactions
Comey faces two federal charges: making a threat against the president and transmitting a threat in interstate commerce. Each charge carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison. The indictment was filed in the Eastern District of North Carolina, where the seashells were reportedly photographed.
"Threatening the life of the President of the United States is a grave violation of our nation's laws. The grand jury returned an indictment alleging James Comey did just that."
Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche
Comey responded to the charges in a statement, asserting his innocence and expressing confidence in the federal judiciary. "I'm still innocent, I'm still not afraid, and I still believe in the independent federal judiciary," he said.
Legal experts question indictment
Some legal analysts have criticized the indictment as flimsy, suggesting it may be politically motivated. Michael Gerhardt, a constitutional law expert at the University of North Carolina School of Law, argued that the post likely falls under First Amendment protections.
"It's very thin. The DOJ will not be able to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that James Comey had the intent to threaten or harm President Trump. The indictment is a transparent attempt to intimidate one of the President's perceived political enemies."
Jimmy Gurulé, former federal prosecutor and Notre Dame Law School professor
Previous legal troubles
This is not the first time Comey has faced federal charges. In September, he was indicted for allegedly lying to Congress during 2020 testimony and obstructing a congressional proceeding. Those charges were dismissed in November after a judge ruled that the prosecutor, Lindsey Halligan, lacked the authority to bring the case. Halligan, a former White House aide with no prior prosecutorial experience, was deemed ineligible to present the indictment to the grand jury.
Despite the dismissal, the judge left open the possibility for the government to refile the charges. Earlier Tuesday, a separate judge allowed Comey's daughter, Maurene Comey-a former federal prosecutor-to proceed with a lawsuit challenging her firing by the Trump administration.
Comey's defense and next steps
Comey deleted the Instagram post shortly after posting it, explaining in a follow-up that he had assumed the seashells were a political message. "I didn't realize some folks associate those numbers with violence," he wrote. "It never occurred to me, but I oppose violence of any kind, so I took the post down."
US Secret Service agents interviewed Comey about the post in May 2025. The investigation culminated in Tuesday's indictment, which legal observers say could face significant hurdles in court due to First Amendment protections and the perceived lack of intent.
