Ask Onix
Former BP chairman rejects conduct allegations
Albert Manifold, removed as BP chair this week, has dismissed reports of bullying and overbearing behavior, calling them "lies" and insisting no concerns were raised during his tenure.
Board cites governance failures in unanimous decision
BP's board ousted Manifold on Tuesday, citing unacceptable conduct and governance oversight. The decision was unanimous, though the company declined to confirm whether bullying specifically triggered his dismissal.
A senior independent director, Amanda Blanc, said the board was "surprised and disappointed" by the issues, which emerged despite Manifold's 40-year career without prior accusations.
Manifold defends leadership style
In a statement on Thursday, Manifold acknowledged his direct approach but denied misconduct. "There is a considerable distance between driving an organization with urgency and the characterizations now being circulated," he said.
He emphasized cost-cutting efforts, noting he rejected corporate perks like private aviation and sports tickets, opting instead for "buying lunch at a local café."
"In my determination to drive change on costs, performance, and shareholder communications, I may have pushed hard and challenged people directly."
Albert Manifold
Shareholder dissent preceded removal
Nearly 20% of BP shareholders voted against Manifold's election at last month's AGM, citing governance concerns. His tenure lasted less than a year after joining the board in September 2025 and becoming chair the following month.
BP had initially praised his "strong track record of strategic leadership," but a spokesperson reiterated the company's stance on Thursday, stating: "We stand by our statement and have a duty of care to all employees."
Anonymity and accountability
Manifold criticized unnamed critics, arguing no one should "hide behind anonymity" when discussing his conduct. He claimed no formal complaints were raised during his chairmanship.
BP has not publicly detailed the specific incidents leading to his removal, but sources indicate behavior described as "bullying" and "overbearing" contributed to the decision.
