Ask Onix
Tech titans clash over OpenAI's future in high-stakes lawsuit
A federal court in California has concluded hearings in the legal dispute between Elon Musk and Sam Altman, centering on allegations that Altman betrayed Musk's vision for OpenAI, the company behind ChatGPT. The jury has retired to deliberate, with a no-nonsense judge poised to render the final verdict after three weeks of explosive testimony.
Musk's core allegation: A broken promise on OpenAI's mission
Musk's lawsuit hinges on the claim that Altman misled him about OpenAI's commitment to remaining a non-profit entity. The billionaire argues he was effectively cheated out of a stake in the company, though he framed the financial loss as minor by his standards. Altman has vehemently denied the accusation, calling it baseless.
A parade of high-profile witnesses, including OpenAI co-founder Ilya Sutskever and Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella, testified they had seen no evidence of Musk's alleged non-profit pledge. Nadella, whose company has invested billions in OpenAI, dismissed the claim during his testimony, though his vested interest was noted by the court.
Altman's credibility under scrutiny amid damning testimony
Altman's reputation took a hit during the trial, fueled by a scathing New Yorker profile published ahead of the hearings. The article, by investigative journalist Ronan Farrow, depicted Altman as a habitual liar, citing his 2023 ousting from OpenAI as a key example. Musk's attorney, Steven Molo, seized on the profile during cross-examination, pressing Altman on his trustworthiness.
"Are you completely trustworthy?" Molo asked. Altman replied, "I believe so," before backtracking to a firm "yes" under further questioning.
Former OpenAI board members and executives testified to Altman's alleged lack of transparency, including his involvement in private start-ups with ties to OpenAI. A $1.5 billion stake in nuclear energy firm Helion Energy, where Altman served as board chair, was highlighted as particularly contentious, given the company's lack of delivered power.
Judge's iron grip and courtroom drama
Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers presided over the trial with a firm hand, enforcing a strict schedule with only two 20-minute breaks per day and no lunch recess. Her no-nonsense approach extended to reprimanding observers for taking unauthorized photos and lawyers for straying into off-limits topics. Despite the tension, she injected dry humor into proceedings, quipping about federal funding after a technical glitch: "What can I tell you? We are funded by the federal government."
Sketch artist Vicki Behringer captured the trial's drama in vivid watercolor illustrations, offering the public a glimpse into the closed-door proceedings.
Personal revelations and power plays in Silicon Valley
The trial peeled back layers of the personal and professional rift between Musk and Altman. Musk, once Altman's mentor, appeared combative on the stand but grew visibly uncomfortable when questioned about his relationship with Shivon Zilis, a Neuralink executive and mother of four of his children. Zilis testified that Musk offered her his sperm after noticing she had no children-a revelation she initially withheld from OpenAI colleagues.
Text messages unveiled during the trial laid bare the cutthroat dynamics of Silicon Valley. Musk allegedly proposed gifting free Teslas to co-founders as a bargaining tactic, while Altman was accused of paying a strategic partner on the side to secure loyalty. Altman, in turn, claimed Musk suggested handing control of OpenAI to his children.
What's next: Jury deliberations and the judge's verdict
The jury's decision will be advisory, with Judge Gonzalez Rogers holding the final say. The outcome could reshape OpenAI's trajectory and the reputations of its most prominent figures. For now, the tech world watches as the legal battle over one of the industry's most valuable start-ups reaches its climax.
Updated 15 May 2026 - Follow The Meta Times' Tech Decoded newsletter for ongoing coverage of this story and other top tech trends.
