Ask Onix
Toronto comedian seeks medically assisted death amid treatment-resistant mental illness
Claire Brosseau, a 49-year-old Toronto resident, has spent decades battling bipolar disorder and PTSD that have left her unable to work, leave her home, or communicate with loved ones. After exhausting all available treatments-from therapy and medication to electroconvulsive therapy-she describes herself as "functionally terminal" and is now petitioning an Ontario court to access medically assisted dying (MAID), currently unavailable in Canada for those whose sole condition is mental illness.
Canada delays expansion of MAID to mental illness cases
Canada has twice postponed plans to extend MAID eligibility to individuals with severe, treatment-resistant mental illness, most recently pushing the decision to 2027. The federal government is now reconsidering whether to proceed at all, citing concerns about healthcare system preparedness. Prime Minister Mark Carney stated last week that he is awaiting a parliamentary committee report before making a decision, emphasizing the need for an "informed position."
Debate intensifies over mental illness and assisted dying
A parliamentary committee reviewing the potential expansion has heard testimony from medical experts and advocates divided on the issue. Some argue that assisted dying risks becoming a substitute for inadequate social supports, such as affordable housing and disability services. Others contend that mental illnesses remain poorly understood, making it difficult to determine whether a patient's suffering is truly irreversible.
"None of those issues have been resolved. Instead, we have even more evidence showing we are not ready to provide MAID for mental illness," said Dr. Sonu Gaind, former chief of psychiatry at a major Toronto hospital.
Dr. Sonu Gaind
Critics of expansion point to the Netherlands, Belgium, and Luxembourg-where MAID is available for mental illness-as cautionary examples. Dutch data shows a rise in psychiatric MAID cases, from two in 2010 to 219 in 2024, though they still represent only 2% of all assisted deaths. Psychiatrist Dr. Jim van Os warned Canadian lawmakers of a potential "suicide contagion effect," while another Dutch psychiatrist, Dr. Sisco Van Veen, defended the practice as a "mercy" for those enduring unbearable suffering.
Legal challenge argues current law is discriminatory
Brosseau's legal case contends that Canada's MAID law unfairly excludes individuals with mental illness, violating constitutional rights. She argues that if she developed cancer, she could refuse treatment and qualify for assisted death-but as a psychiatric patient, she is denied the same option. "I'm not campaigning for death. I'm campaigning to be seen as not a subsection of human," she told the BBC.
In 2024, 96% of Canada's MAID requests were granted to terminally ill patients, primarily those with cancer. The remaining 4% involved individuals with "grievous and irremediable" conditions, though not imminently fatal. The program's expansion five years ago to include non-terminal patients followed a legal battle by two disabled individuals, but it has since faced criticism. Advocacy groups, including Inclusion Canada, report cases where MAID was suggested to disabled individuals without their request, prompting calls to restrict eligibility to terminal illnesses only.
Committee faces scrutiny over bias allegations
The parliamentary committee's review has drawn criticism for its composition and process. Brosseau said she was denied multiple requests to testify, while the committee prioritized input from professionals and associations. Co-chairs Liberal MP Marcus Powlowski and Conservative Senator Yonah Martin, both publicly opposed to expansion, defended the process as balanced. However, Alberta Senator Kristopher Wells accused the review of being "one-sided," expressing doubt in its final report, due by October.
Brosseau, who rarely leaves her home due to severe anxiety and panic attacks, said she has little faith in the committee or the government's response to her legal challenge. Yet she views her fight as a matter of equal rights, insisting that her suffering should be treated with the same legitimacy as physical illness.