Ask Onix
Beer taxes surpass gas export revenue in Australia
An unexpected revelation during a Senate hearing in February has reignited debate over Australia's taxation of its gas industry. Treasury officials confirmed that the country earns more tax revenue from beer than from gas exports, a fact that shocked lawmakers and the public alike.
Viral moment sparks national conversation
Independent Senator David Pocock pressed officials on the disparity, asking, "How do we live in a country, one of the biggest gas exporters in the world, and we're getting more tax from beer?" The exchange, viewed nearly 10 million times on Instagram, has fueled calls for a 25% tax on gas exports.
Public support for the tax is growing, with a recent poll showing 57% of voters in favor and only 12% opposed. However, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has ruled out the measure, citing concerns over investor confidence and fuel security.
Economic arguments for reform
Proponents argue that Australia's gas taxation system is outdated. The Australia Institute, a progressive think tank, estimates a 25% export tax could generate A$17 billion (£9 billion, US$12 billion) annually. Former Treasury Secretary Dr. Ken Henry, who proposed a similar mining tax in 2008, criticized the current system as shortsighted.
"Imagine if I were to come to you and put this proposition to you: I'll sell your house and I'll give you 30% and I'll keep the other 70%, and you should be happy with that because I've just converted an asset into cash. None of you would be stupid enough to do that."
Dr. Ken Henry, former Treasury Secretary
Japan, a major importer of Australian gas, earns more revenue from taxing these imports than Australia does from its own exports. Meanwhile, Australia's sovereign wealth fund stands at A$267 billion-less than 10% of Norway's fund, despite Australia's larger population and resource wealth.
Industry pushes back
Energy companies have launched a counter-campaign, warning that a gas tax could deter investment. Shell, which paid just A$109 million in Petroleum Resource Rent Tax (PRRT) on A$2.5 billion in revenue from its Gorgon project last year, argued that Australia's tax system is already "generous." Chevron and Santos echoed concerns, claiming the proposal could destabilize domestic gas supplies and damage Australia's reputation as a stable investment destination.
Prime Minister Albanese dismissed comparisons to beer taxes as "complete fantasy," noting the sector paid A$22 billion in taxes last year. He emphasized the importance of gas exports for national fuel security, particularly amid global supply disruptions linked to the US-Israeli conflict with Iran.
Legal and political hurdles
Economists dispute industry claims that a gas tax would violate existing contracts. John Quiggin, a professor at the University of Queensland, stated, "There's no way a gas exporter can sign a contract that promises tax policy won't change." He also questioned the argument that investors would flee, asking, "Where are they going to go?"
Samantha Hepburn, a natural resource law expert at Deakin University, highlighted the inconsistency between Australia's climate goals-including net-zero emissions by 2050-and its continued support for new gas projects. "The perspective there is that we can't really be opening up new gas projects," she said.
Future of the debate
While the gas tax is unlikely to be included in next week's federal budget, political observers believe it will eventually become inevitable. Support spans the political spectrum, from the Greens to the right-wing One Nation party. Senator Pocock, who has led the campaign, tweeted on Tuesday, "The pressure on government to act is growing, and at some point, the prime minister has to put Australia first."
The cost-of-living crisis and soaring domestic gas prices have amplified public frustration, ensuring the issue remains a dominant topic ahead of the budget announcement.
